8 research outputs found

    Building-integrated rooftop greenhouses: an energy and environmental assessment in the mediterranean context

    Get PDF
    A sustainable and secure food supply within a low-carbon and resilient infrastructure is encapsulated in several of The United Nations’ 17 sustainable development goals. The integration of urban agriculture in buildings can offer improved efficiencies; in recognition of this, the first south European example of a fully integrated rooftop greenhouse (iRTG) was designed and incorporated into the ICTA-ICP building by the Autonomous University of Barcelona. This design seeks to interchange heat, CO2 and rainwater between the building and its rooftop greenhouse. Average air temperatures for 2015 in the iRTG were 16.5 °C (winter) and 25.79 °C (summer), making the iRTG an ideal growing environment. Using detailed thermophysical fabric properties, 2015 site-specific weather data, exact control strategies and dynamic soil temperatures, the iRTG was modelled in EnergyPlus to assess the performance of an equivalent ‘freestanding’ greenhouse. The validated result shows that the thermal interchange between the iRTG and the ICTA-ICP building has considerable moderating effects on the iRTG’s indoor climate; since average hourly temperatures in an equivalent freestanding greenhouse would have been 4.1 °C colder in winter and 4.4 °C warmer in summer under the 2015 climatic conditions. The simulation results demonstrate that the iRTG case study recycled 43.78 MWh of thermal energy (or 341.93 kWh/m2/yr) from the main building in 2015. Assuming 100% energy conversion efficiency, compared to freestanding greenhouses heated with oil, gas or biomass systems, the iRTG delivered an equivalent carbon savings of 113.8, 82.4 or 5.5 kg CO2(eq)/m2/yr, respectively, and economic savings of 19.63, 15.88 or 17.33 €/m2/yr, respectively. Under similar climatic conditions, this symbiosis between buildings and urban agriculture makes an iRTG an efficient resource-management model and supports the promotion of a new typology or concept of buildings with a nexus or symbiosis between energy efficiency and food production.Postprint (published version

    Improving urban metabolism: bi-directional energy and environmental benefits of rooftop greenhouse and building integration

    Get PDF
    Rapid global urbanisation in 21st century results in cities consuming vast resources but also offering unique opportunities for more integrated and circular resource management. This work investigates potential benefits of urban agriculture and buildings integration through a demonstrator building (ICTA). Actual building and integrated Rooftop Greenhouse (iRTG) data demonstrate wide thermal profiles across ICTA six levels and the potential for heat exchange within the building. Calibrated model monthly results indicate reduced building heating needs resulting from iRTG inclusion. However, more modest GSHP electrical cooling reductions resulting from plant transpiration showed reversing potential which requires more in-depth analysis of underlying principles.The authors are grateful to the Secretaria d'Universitats i Recerca del Departament d'Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya for the award of a research scholarship (FI-DGR 2016) to Joan Muñoz Liesa; the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) for the financial support of the research project Fertilectiy II “Integrated rooftop greenhouses: energy, waste and CO2 symbiosis with the building. Towards foods security in a circular economy” (CTM2016-75772-C3-1-R; CTM2016-75772-C3-2-R) and the María de Maeztu program for Units of Excellence in R&D (MDM-2015-0552).Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

    Comparison of organic substrates in urban rooftop agriculture, towards improving crop production resilience to water stress in Mediterranean cities

    Get PDF
    Unidad de excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2019-000940-MBACKGROUND: Urban agriculture contributes to meet food production demand in cities. In a context of low water availability, it is important to consider alternatives that are able to maintain production. This study aimed to assess the use of substrates made from local materials and high water retention capacity as an alternative for urban agriculture in periods with water stress. Different substrates were used for 3 consecutive crop cycles of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) during the spring and summer periods of 2018 to observe these substrates performance during warmer periods of the year in an integrated rooftop greenhouse near Barcelona. The substrates used were coir commercial organic substrate, vegetable Compost from urban organic waste, Perlite (as control) commercial standard substrate, and a Mixture of the urban Compost and Perlite (1:1). Substrate crop performance was assessed under conventionally irrigation (0-5 cbar) and water restricted conditions (irrigation stop until the water tension inside the perlite bags reached -20 cbar). RESULTS: The results demonstrate that the Compost and Mix yields were similar to those obtained from Perlite (11.5% y 3.7% of more production in a restricted water condition average values). Compared to the Perlite, the organic substrates increased the crops resilience to water restriction, through biomass accumulation comparison, it took longer for Coir to lose water (1 and 2 test); however, when dryness began, it occurred very quickly. CONCLUSION: The vegetable Compost and the substrate Mixture presented tolerance to water restriction when water restriction reached -20 cbar

    Quantifying energy symbiosis of building-integrated agriculture in a mediterranean rooftop greenhouse

    No full text
    A major concern for sustainable development is urban systems energy consumption. A possible way to gain additional whole system energy efficiencies is to integrate rooftop greenhouses (iRTG) on unoccupied roofs. This work presents actual environmental data (2015–2018) and calibrated energy modelling results to analyze the energy symbiosis between an iRTG and the host building. Simulation results illustrate that annually 98 kWh/m2 of heating energy is passively recovered (84% during night time) from the building by the iRTG. Conversely the iRTG insulating capacity resulted in annual energy saving of 35 kWh/m2 for the host building (equal to 4% of the building’s annual energy needs). When combined an overall 128 kWh/m2 of net energy savings and 45.6 kg CO2 eq/m2 of savings are realised via iRTG. On average, iRTG daytime temperatures can be 5.1 °C warmer (summer) and -4.3 °C cooler (winter) than the building. This presents major potentials for recovery and exchange of heating and cooling energy flows through integrating heating and ventilation air conditioning systems of the building and iRTG. Hence, iRTGs can provide a source of renewable energy as well as a sink for building exhaust air to improve energy efficiencies of urban built environment and urban agriculture.The authors are grateful to the Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya for the award of a research scholarship (FI-DGR 2018) to Joan Muñoz-Liesa; to the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona for the award of a research scholarship (PIF-2017) to Martí Rufí-Salís; to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) for the financial support to the research project Fertilectiy II “Integrated rooftop greenhouses: energy, waste and CO2 symbiosis with the building. Towards foods security in a circular economy” (CTM2016-75772-C3-1-R; CTM2016-75772-C3-2-R). Authors also acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, through the “María de Maeztu” program for Units of Excellence (MDM-2015-0552). This work was additionally enabled by the Càtedra JG Ingenieros – Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya and the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grand EP/P001173/1. Authors also thank Oriol Baeza, Prof. Xavier Gabarrell, Prof. Joan Rieradevall and the ICTA-UAB staff for their very valuable supporting advise and help.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Building-integrated rooftop greenhouses: an energy and environmental assessment in the mediterranean context

    No full text
    A sustainable and secure food supply within a low-carbon and resilient infrastructure is encapsulated in several of The United Nations’ 17 sustainable development goals. The integration of urban agriculture in buildings can offer improved efficiencies; in recognition of this, the first south European example of a fully integrated rooftop greenhouse (iRTG) was designed and incorporated into the ICTA-ICP building by the Autonomous University of Barcelona. This design seeks to interchange heat, CO2 and rainwater between the building and its rooftop greenhouse. Average air temperatures for 2015 in the iRTG were 16.5 °C (winter) and 25.79 °C (summer), making the iRTG an ideal growing environment. Using detailed thermophysical fabric properties, 2015 site-specific weather data, exact control strategies and dynamic soil temperatures, the iRTG was modelled in EnergyPlus to assess the performance of an equivalent ‘freestanding’ greenhouse. The validated result shows that the thermal interchange between the iRTG and the ICTA-ICP building has considerable moderating effects on the iRTG’s indoor climate; since average hourly temperatures in an equivalent freestanding greenhouse would have been 4.1 °C colder in winter and 4.4 °C warmer in summer under the 2015 climatic conditions. The simulation results demonstrate that the iRTG case study recycled 43.78 MWh of thermal energy (or 341.93 kWh/m2/yr) from the main building in 2015. Assuming 100% energy conversion efficiency, compared to freestanding greenhouses heated with oil, gas or biomass systems, the iRTG delivered an equivalent carbon savings of 113.8, 82.4 or 5.5 kg CO2(eq)/m2/yr, respectively, and economic savings of 19.63, 15.88 or 17.33 €/m2/yr, respectively. Under similar climatic conditions, this symbiosis between buildings and urban agriculture makes an iRTG an efficient resource-management model and supports the promotion of a new typology or concept of buildings with a nexus or symbiosis between energy efficiency and food production

    Mortality risk assessment in Spain and Italy, insights of the HOPE COVID-19 registry.

    No full text
    Recently the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has been declared a pandemic. Despite its aggressive extension and significant morbidity and mortality, risk factors are poorly characterized outside China. We designed a registry, HOPE COVID-19 (NCT04334291), assessing data of 1021 patients discharged (dead or alive) after COVID-19, from 23 hospitals in 4 countries, between 8 February and 1 April. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality aiming to produce a mortality risk score calculator. The median age was 68 years (IQR 52-79), and 59.5% were male. Most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (46.8%) and dyslipidemia (35.8%). A relevant heart or lung disease were depicted in 20%. And renal, neurological, or oncological disease, respectively, were detected in nearly 10%. Most common symptoms were fever, cough, and dyspnea at admission. 311 patients died and 710 were discharged alive. In the death-multivariate analysis, raised as most relevant: age, hypertension, obesity, renal insufficiency, any immunosuppressive disease, 02 saturation  0.999; bootstrap-optimist: 0.0018). We provide a simple clinical score to estimate probability of death, dividing patients in four grades (I-IV) of increasing probability. Hydroxychloroquine (79.2%) and antivirals (67.6%) were the specific drugs most commonly used. After a propensity score adjustment, the results suggested a slight improvement in mortality rates (adjusted-ORhydroxychloroquine 0.88; 95% CI 0.81-0.91, p = 0.005; adjusted-ORantiviral 0.94; 95% CI 0.87-1.01; p = 0.115). COVID-19 produces important mortality, mostly in patients with comorbidities with respiratory symptoms. Hydroxychloroquine could be associated with survival benefit, but this data need to be confirmed with further trials. Trial Registration: NCT04334291/EUPAS34399

    Comparison of quantification methods to measure fire-derived (black/elemental) carbon in soils and sediments using reference materials from soil, water, sediment and the atmosphere

    Get PDF
    Black carbon (BC), the product of incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass (called elemental carbon (EC) in atmospheric sciences), was quantified in 12 different materials by 17 laboratories from different disciplines, using seven different methods. The materials were divided into three classes: (1) potentially interfering materials, (2) laboratory-produced BC-rich materials, and (3) BC-containing environmental matrices (from soil, water, sediment, and atmosphere). This is the first comprehensive intercomparison of this type (multimethod, multilab, and multisample), focusing mainly on methods used for soil and sediment BC studies. Results for the potentially interfering materials (which by definition contained no fire-derived organic carbon) highlighted situations where individual methods may overestimate BC concentrations. Results for the BC-rich materials (one soot and two chars) showed that some of the methods identified most of the carbon in all three materials as BC, whereas other methods identified only soot carbon as BC. The different methods also gave widely different BC contents for the environmental matrices. However, these variations could be understood in the light of the findings for the other two groups of materials, i.e., that some methods incorrectly identify non-BC carbon as BC, and that the detection efficiency of each technique varies across the BC continuum. We found that atmospheric BC quantification methods are not ideal for soil and sediment studies as in their methodology these incorporate the definition of BC as light-absorbing material irrespective of its origin, leading to biases when applied to terrestrial and sedimentary materials. This study shows that any attempt to merge data generated via different methods must consider the different, operationally defined analytical windows of the BC continuum detected by each technique, as well as the limitations and potential biases of each technique. A major goal of this ring trial was to provide a basis on which to choose between the different BC quantification methods in soil and sediment studies. In this paper we summarize the advantages and disadvantages of each method. In future studies, we strongly recommend the evaluation of all methods analyzing for BC in soils and sediments against the set of BC reference materials analyzed here
    corecore